Freemium vs. Tiered Pricing Models: Which Approach Works Best?

Featured

Featured connects subject-matter experts with top publishers to increase their exposure and create Q & A content.

3 min read

Freemium vs. Tiered Pricing Models: Which Approach Works Best?

© Image Provided by Featured

Table of Contents

Freemium vs. Tiered Pricing Models: Which Approach Works Best?

Choosing the right pricing model can make or break a business. This article explores the pros and cons of freemium and tiered pricing strategies, drawing on expert insights to help you make an informed decision. From building trust with free offerings to designing comprehensive paid tiers, discover which approach aligns best with your product and target market.

  • Freemium Builds Trust When Genuinely Useful
  • Flexible Pricing Adapts to Diverse Camp Needs
  • Simple Tiers with Usage Limits Drive Upgrades
  • Design Pricing Tiers for Complete Problem Solving

Freemium Builds Trust When Genuinely Useful

I used to think freemium was just a way to bait people in. You know, give them a crumb, hope they pay for the cookie. But running Twistly has completely flipped that idea for me.

We didn’t choose freemium because it was trendy—we did it because it felt fair. I remember building decks at 1 a.m. before big meetings, hunting for design hacks and praying PowerPoint wouldn’t crash. I wanted Twistly to feel like a real helping hand, not a sales funnel.

What’s worked best for us is making the free tier genuinely useful. Like, you can actually finish a polished presentation without paying a cent. And I think people appreciate that—it builds trust. There’s no anxiety, no “ugh, now I have to upgrade just to export” moment.

That said, we’ve messed up the balance before. Once, we locked down too much behind the paywall. It backfired—folks felt teased, not helped. We had to step back, listen, and loosen the reins.

Freemium only works if it comes from the right place. For us, it’s not “how can we convert users?” It’s more like: “Are we actually being useful here?” If the answer’s yes, the rest tends to follow.

Diana BabaevaDiana Babaeva
Founder & CEO, Twistly


Flexible Pricing Adapts to Diverse Camp Needs

At Camp Network, we believe rigid tiered pricing models often don’t suit the seasonal nature and budget constraints of camps. What works exceptionally well for us is our transparent, pay-as-you-go pricing model. There are zero upfront or monthly fees for most organizations. Our standard is a small per-transaction processing fee which can often be covered by participants, resulting in effectively zero cost to the organization.

However, we recognize the unique needs of certain groups. That’s why we also offer a straightforward tiered pricing structure to accommodate non-profits and other camps that do not receive payment (e.g., free community camps, internal school programs where no money changes hands with participants). This ensures every camp, regardless of their payment model, can find a price that works best for them, providing them with the same robust tools for online registration, data management, and communication. This flexibility and predictability remove financial barriers, building immense trust and allowing camps of all sizes to easily adopt our platform.

Andrew DowningAndrew Downing
CEO, Camp Network


Simple Tiers with Usage Limits Drive Upgrades

In my growth role at Lusha, I’ve found that offering a generous free tier with clear usage limits (like 5 searches/month) creates a natural upgrade path when users hit those limits. We actually keep our pricing tiers super simple – just 3 options with clear value differentiators – which has reduced decision paralysis and helped our sales team have more focused conversations.

Yarden MorganYarden Morgan
Director of Growth, Lusha


Design Pricing Tiers for Complete Problem Solving

In my experience, one thing that really makes tiered pricing effective is when each tier solves a complete problem.

When we were designing the pricing model for MrScraper, I didn’t just think in terms of what to restrict but also what each type of user is trying to accomplish. I understood that a freelancer scraping for one client doesn’t need the same tools as a company running dozens of concurrent jobs with rotating proxies.

So instead of just stacking limits, we built each tier as a complete toolkit for a specific stage of growth. That approach helped us to reduce churn because our clients weren’t just upgrading to remove restrictions, but were upgrading because the next tier genuinely unlocked the next phase of what they wanted to do.

Cahyo SubrotoCahyo Subroto
Founder, MrScraper


Up Next