How do you determine when to make the first offer in a negotiation? Can you describe a time this strategy worked well for you?

Question

Mastering the art of negotiation can significantly impact business success, and knowing when to make the first offer is a crucial skill. This article explores strategic approaches to initiating negotiations, drawing on insights from seasoned experts in the field. From profiling counterparts to leveraging information asymmetry, readers will gain valuable knowledge on how to confidently present value-driven proposals and set the tone for successful negotiations.

Sinoun Chea · Answer

Understanding when to make the first offer in a negotiation often hinges on gauging the personality of the person you're dealing with. Tools like the DISC or OCEAN models can be instrumental in profiling your counterpart. For instance, if the DISC analysis indicates that the counterpart is assertive (a high D type), making the first offer can set the stage and show confidence, potentially steering the negotiation your way. This approach worked well for me when dealing with a client who had a very dominant personality; presenting a well-researched first offer established a strong baseline, compelling them to align more with my expectations.
If your counterpart is more cooperative or cautious, as seen in a high S or C from the DISC model, initially listening and gathering information might be more strategic. This gives you the chance to tailor a first offer that reflects their needs and concerns, fostering trust and collaboration. Preparing an empathetic narrative aligned with their interests can break down barriers, allowing for smoother negotiations. Timing is crucial; make your offer once you've gathered enough understanding from their responses and questions. This not only enhances the offer's acceptability but also strengthens your positioning in the negotiation.

Ace Zhuo · Answer

Deciding when to initiate the first proposal in a negotiation largely hinges on analyzing the situation and recognizing the value you contribute. If you have a solid understanding of your stance and the priorities of the other side, it is often beneficial to put forward the initial proposal. This helps establish the framework of the conversation and influence the direction toward favorable results. For example, I once facilitated a collaboration where I identified the other party's core objectives early in the process.
By delivering a well-prepared and assertive initial proposal, I positioned myself as aligned with their interests while showcasing my expertise. The outcome was a mutually beneficial arrangement that surpassed my expectations. Timing matters just as much as strategy, so thorough preparation and reading the dynamics at hand remain crucial. This approach highlights a dedication to deliberate, strategic decision-making during negotiations.

Swayam Doshi · Answer

The decision to make the first offer hinges on information asymmetry—I move first when I have more market knowledge than my counterpart. This approach proved invaluable when negotiating our company's largest sustainable packaging contract. Before meeting with the major retail chain, our team conducted extensive research on their sustainability goals, pain points with current packaging suppliers, and specific metrics they valued. This preparation revealed they were struggling to meet new plastic reduction targets, a challenge our hemp-based packaging directly addressed.
We opened with a precisely calibrated first offer that emphasized environmental impact metrics alongside pricing. Our proposal specifically highlighted achieving 83% less plastic waste compared to their current solution, with only a 7% cost increase that would be offset by customer loyalty benefits. By making this well-informed first offer, we established the negotiation framework around sustainability performance rather than just price.
The retailer ultimately accepted terms within 5% of our opening proposal—significantly better than the 15-20% concession we had anticipated making. The key was entering the negotiation with superior information that allowed us to confidently set an anchor aligned with the customer's true priorities rather than their stated ones.

Timothy Allen · Answer

In a negotiation, is it better to make the first offer or let the other party make the first offer?
Contrary to popular belief, I believe the answer is variable. If you do not know what an appropriate market rate is, then yes, you should let the other party make the first offer, because you might set your offer too low (assuming you want a high number). On the other hand, if you are familiar with the market rate (because you've done your research), making the first offer can lend you a significant advantage, in that it sets the other person's expectations for what you expect.

Kris Flank · Answer

I tend to make the first offer in a negotiation when I know enough to steer the ship without accidentally sinking it. If I'm clear on the value we bring and have a good sense of the other side's expectations, I'm happy to set the tone.
One time this worked beautifully was with a client notorious for "exploring options" (read: ghosting after three months of back-and-forth). Instead of playing email tennis, I put forward a bold, clear offer early--and framed it as "Here's how we can help you hit X result without the faff." They signed within the week.
The truth? Going first lets you anchor the conversation before it turns into a guessing game of "how low can you go." But if you're walking into the chat blind? It's best to keep your poker face on and let them blink first. Negotiation is like chess... but with invoices.

Kevin Bryan · Answer

I've learned that making the first offer in a negotiation can be a decisive move--if you're prepared. At The Alloy Market, we once had a bulk buyback opportunity with a longtime customer who was hesitant about pricing. Rather than waiting for them to anchor low, I made a fair but firm offer supported by market data and historical trends. That confidence immediately shifted the tone--they saw we understood our value and weren't playing games. We closed the deal quickly, and both sides walked away satisfied. My rule of thumb is: if you've done your homework and know your numbers, don't be afraid to take the lead. It sets the frame for the entire conversation and positions you in the driver's seat. Just ensure that the first number is considered, not just bold.

Sara Millecam · Answer

I initially prepare after a cup of coffee, a perusal of my margins, and a reminder to myself that I'm not running a charity.
There was once a salon business owner who slid into my inbox asking for a "friendly discount." I responded with a bundle package so clean that it might have been italicized. It included product, shipping, and training with precise pricing. No hesitation. No delay. Pure business with a smile.
She hesitated. And then she said yes.
Having a first offer spared me from ten rounds of "what's your best price" back-and-forth. It allowed me to make the first move with value rather than sparring around discounts like in a romantic comedy. And honestly, it felt good to send it without flying blind with glitter and hope.
Now I negotiate the same way I do a great brow shape--simple, intentional, and never about someone else's opinion.

Seann Malloy · Answer

As a law firm, we rely on what we have called the "Confident Anchor Approach" when deciding whether to make the first offer in a negotiation. This strategy is most effective when we've done our homework and have a good sense of the market value or legal positioning of what's at issue. 
When we make the first offer, we frame the conversation in OUR terms. By offering our own well-researched and tailored offer, backed by our own data, we create credibility and at the same time subtly steer the negotiation process toward a better outcome. The key is getting that balance right -- an assertive, but reasonable, anchor that sends the message of our value, as well as our familiarity with what the market will bear.
We used this approach recently in a settlement negotiation of a commercial dispute. Rather than waiting for the other side to make an initial move, we set the tone with a demand backed by case law, expected litigation costs, and comparable settlements. The key takeaway here is that a strategic anchor creates leverage while also projecting confidence and preparation, which is vital to any negotiation.

Ross Wilbur · Answer

I typically initiate the first offer when I have a strong understanding of the value we provide and a clear grasp of the client's needs and budget range. By anchoring the conversation with a well-reasoned proposal, we set the tone and keep the discussion grounded in our value.
On one occasion, we were negotiating a long-term commercial pool maintenance contract. I opened with a comprehensive offer that highlighted not just our pricing but also the reliability, responsiveness, and proactive service for which we're known. That anchor provided the client with a benchmark they could trust. It streamlined the back-and-forth, built confidence, and we secured a multi-year deal that's still going strong today.

When to Make the First Offer in a Negotiation

Table of Contents

When to Make the First Offer in a Negotiation

Profile Counterparts for Strategic Offers

Establish Framework with Well-Prepared Proposal

Leverage Information Asymmetry in Negotiations

Set Expectations with Market Knowledge

Make Bold Offers to Avoid Guessing Games

Take the Lead with Confident Pricing

Present Value-Driven Packages Upfront

Frame Negotiations with Confident Anchor Approach

Initiate Offers with Strong Value Understanding

Up Next